Results compared with EMBL annotation

 

Genome Number of Annotated
CDS in EMBL
CDS with Matched Annotation CDS with
Different Matches
CDS with only
Restauro-G Annotation
Time
Bacillus subtilis 4106 4100 6 0 1110sec
Escherichia coli K12 4259 4202 57 43 510sec
Mycoplasma genitalium 476 476 0 0 212sec
Mycobacterium tuberculosis 4186 4137 61 59 2430sec

Pyrococcus furiosus
2057 2043 14 7 1195sec





 

Bacillus subtilis

Table S1. Mismatched genes between Restauro-G annotation and EMBL annotation in Bacillus subtilis

Table S5. List of genes that only Restauro-G annotated in Bacillus subtilis

Escherichia coli K12

Table S2. Mismatched genes between Restauro-G annotation and EMBL annotation in Escherichia coli K12

Table S6. List of genes that only Restauro-G annotated in Escherichia coli K12

 

 

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Table S3. Mismatched genes between Restauro-G annotation and EMBL annotation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

 

Pyrococcus furiosus

Table S4. Mismatched genes between Restauro-G annotation and EMBL annotation in Pyrococcus furiosus

Table S7. List of genes that only Restauro-G annotated in Pyrococcus furiosus

 


(C) 2006 Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University